This is the most understandable objection on the list, and the one we hear most often from people who have done other courses and come out the other side no clearer than they went in.
The Roadmap is built to avoid that outcome on purpose. It does not stack up information and leave you to make sense of it. Each of the nine steps connects a key decision-making concept to a real, specific question about your own situation - financial, knowledge, risk tolerance, time and capacity, decision clarity. The deliverable at the end is not "more to think about". It is an answer.
That answer is either a confident yes - in which case you know what kind of project, at what scale, with what funding path, supported by what gaps you still need to close - or a clear no, in which case you know why and you can put the question down without it sitting on your chest for another two years.
If you do the work and still cannot decide, that itself is information. It almost always points to one specific dimension - usually risk or capital - that is unresolved. You will know which one, and what would need to change for it to resolve. That is a real answer too.
The Roadmap is structured so you leave with a clear next step - yes, no, or the one thing you still need to resolve.